AS THE WORLD SQUIRMSã

Monday, January 26, 2009

 

*    

 

Click on dot (above) or “Home” (below) for latest edition of: As The World Squirms

 

 

 

Note: Some items contained herein may have additional formatting, emphasis and hotlinks added for context and perspective  ~ Owen

 

 

 

Archives & Resources

 

·       As The World Squirm (previous editions)

·       Menu – Updating Information Sources

·       Political Music & Music Videos

·       Favorite Quotes

 

---

 

Google


 Search www.hotpolitics.com 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

UN’s Special Torture Rapporteur: Bush, Rumsfeld Should be Pursued for Torture

 

BERLIN (AFP) — The UN's special torture rapporteur called on the US Tuesday to pursue former president George W. Bush and defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld for torture and bad treatment of Guantanamo prisoners.

 

"Judicially speaking, the United States has a clear obligation" to bring proceedings against Bush and Rumsfeld, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Manfred Nowak said, in remarks to be broadcast on Germany's ZDF television Tuesday evening.

 

He noted Washington had ratified the UN convention on torture which required "all means, particularly penal law" to be used to bring proceedings against those violating it.

 

"We have all these documents that are now publicly available that prove that these methods of interrogation were intentionally ordered by Rumsfeld," against detainees at the US prison facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Nowak said.

 

"But obviously the highest authorities in the United States were aware of this," added Nowak, who authored a UN investigation report on the Guantanamo prison. (Read More)

 

 

---

 

 

DEFENDING "GOOD FAITH" TORTURE

U.S. Senator John Cornyn Promotes Washington’s “Good Faith” Torturers - Delays Vote for Attorney General Nominee Over Waterboarding

 

COMMENT: John W. Dean, FindLaw.com columnist and former counsel to the president - January 23, 2009: “Remarkably, the confirmation of President Obama's Attorney General nominee, Eric Holder, is being held up by Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn, who apparently is unhappy that Holder might actually investigate and prosecute Bush Administration officials who engaged in torture. Aside from this repugnant new Republican embrace of torture (which might be a winning issue for the lunatic fringe of the party and a nice way to further marginalize the GOP), any effort to protect Bush officials from legal responsibility for war crimes, in the long run, will not work.

 

It is difficult to believe that Eric Holder would agree not to enforce the law, like his recent Republican predecessors. Indeed, if he were to do so, President Obama should withdraw his nomination. But as MSNBC "Countdown" anchor Keith Olbermann stated earlier this week, even if the Obama Administration for whatever reason does not investigate and prosecute these crimes, this still does not mean that the Bush Administration officials who were involved in torture are going to get a pass.

 

With few exceptions, the discussion about what the Obama Administration will do regarding the torture of detainees during the Bush years has been framed as a domestic matter, and the fate of those involved in torturing has been largely viewed as a question of whether the Department of Justice will take action. In fact, not only is the world watching what the Obama Administration does regarding Bush's torturers, but other countries are very likely to take action if the United States fails to do so. (Read More)

 

 

---

 

BUSINESS AS USUAL? Obama’s Envoy Won’t Introduce Any New Policies, Israeli President Assures

Mitchell Heads to Israel as Fragile Ceasefire Talks Continue

January 25, 2009

New US Envoy George Mitchell will be arriving in the Middle East by Wednesday, but Israeli President Shimon Peres sees no reason for the Israeli government to be concerned.

These are mere overtures by the new US administration in order to learn more about the situation,” Peres insisted, saying that Mitchell would not be pressuring Israel on policy or introducing any sort of new US policies for the Obama Administration.

Other officials had speculated the Obama Administration would pressure Israel on the illegal outposts in the West Bank, something the Bush Administration repeatedly attempted (unsuccessfully) to do. With the new president seemingly as reluctant as the last one to criticize Israel on broader policies, like the 22-day war in the Gaza Strip, it seems there is little cause for concern in the Israeli government.

But when Mitchell arrives the emphasis is likely to be placed on shoring up the still fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. This effort is likely to be considerably hampered by the fact that while Mitchell intends to meet with Israeli officials and Fatah President Abbas, he will not be meeting with any Hamas officials during the visit.

Related Stories

compiled by Jason Ditz [email the author]

 

 

 

---

 

 

Dr Mahathir Mohamad: Nobel Laureate and Former Malaysian Prime Minister Proposes War Crimes Charges Against Israel

 

Kuala Lumpur, January 10, 2009:Dr Mahathir said Israel’s actions were primitive because it killed to solve problems. ‘Having such a tribunal would be able to put fear in Israeli leaders,’ he told reporters after receiving donations for Palestine war victims as chairman of the Kuala Lumpur Foundation To Criminalise War (KLFCW) at the Al-Bukhary Foundation Complex here yesterday.”

 

 

---

 

 

 

BUSINESS AS USUAL? Biden Indicates US Attacks in Pakistan Will Continue

New VP Won't Comment on Latest Strikes

 

January 25, 2009

 

Answering questions about US policy with respect to its ongoing attacks in Pakistan, Vice President Joe Biden pointed reporters to President Obama’s comments during the campaign that “if there is an actionable target, of a high-level Al-Qaeda personnel, that he would not hesitate to use action to deal with that.”

As far as last week’s attacks in North and South Waziristan, which killed 22 people including a number of children, Biden declared that “I can’t speak to any particular attack. I can’t speak to any particular action. It’s not appropriate for me to do that.”[???] Pakistan has repeatedly complained about the attacks, saying they undermine the nation’s efforts to isolate militant groups along the border region.

 

Between the election and the inauguration, the incoming Obama Administration often insisted it was inappropriate to talk about foreign policy issues. It was assumed, given President Obama’s insistence that “there’s been too much secrecy” in government, that the new administration would be at least somewhat more open with its assorted attacks. Yet every official asked about the killings has given the same refrain, so common during the Bush Administration: no comment.

Related Stories

 

compiled by Jason Ditz [email the author]

 

 

---

 

 

Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari: U.S. Missiles "Don't Help" Pakistan War

 

Kamran Haider, January 25, 2009, ISLAMABAD (Reuters): “U.S. missile attacks on Islamist militants in Pakistan do not help its efforts in the U.S.-led campaign against militancy, a spokesman for President Asif Ali Zardari said on Sunday.

 

U.S. drones fired missiles into Pakistan late on Friday killing 17 people, intelligence officials and residents said, in the first such strike since Barack Obama became U.S. president.

 

Pakistan objects to the strikes on its territory, saying they not only a violation of its sovereignty but are counter-productive to its efforts to tackle the militants in its lawless ethnic Pashtun lands on the Afghan border.”

 

 

 

 

 

---