As The World Squirmsã

 

~Serious Comment for Serious People - A Global Perspective for Just a Few Friends~

 

(Click here to view the latest issue of the  ‘Squirms’)

 

Sunday, July 27, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

Archives & Resources

 

·       As The World Squirms

·       Menu – Constantly Updating Information Sources

·       Political Music & Music Videos

·      U.S. Israel Lobby & General (Videos, Commentaries, Interviews)

 

---

 

Google


 Search www.hotpolitics.com 

HINT: Use the new Google search engine (above) to locate a specific item within the Hotpoliticsã / As The World Squirmsã Archives. When Google locates a page (or list of promising pages) containing your search  keyword(s), use your Edit and Find Function (upper browser toolbar) to scroll directly through the selected search page(s) to your keyword(s).

 

 

 

 

 

---

(Click on Logo)

---

 

 

 

---

 

Special Comment

 

Bugliosi Testifies Before Congress: "Bush Guilty of First-Degree Murder”

(Video)

 

Will Bush Regime Inadvertently Identify Its Torturers and War Criminals Via Issuance of "Pre-Emptive" Pardons?

Charlie Savage reports for The New York Times: "Felons are asking President Bush for pardons and commutations at historic levels as he nears his final months in office, a time when many other presidents have granted a flurry of clemency requests.... As the administration wrestles with the cascade of petitions, some lawyers and law professors are raising a related question: Will Mr. Bush grant pre-emptive pardons to officials involved in controversial counterterrorism programs?" Continue…

 

The Militarization of American Culture - US Military Recruits Children: "America's Army" Video Game Violates International Law

Michael Regan reports for Truthout.org: “In May of 2002, the United States Army invaded E3, the annual video game convention held in Los Angeles. At the city's Convention Center, young game enthusiasts mixed with camouflaged soldiers, Humvees and a small tank parked near the entrance. Thundering helicopter sound effects drew the curious to the Army's interactive display, where a giant video screen flashed the words "Empower yourself. Defend America ... You will be a soldier." Continue…

 

 

President Dwight D. Eisenhower

Farewell address

January 17, 1961

 

"Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II and Korea... We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions... We must not fail to comprehend its grave implications... We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex."

 

 

CENTCOM: America’s the Name, Intimidation’s the Game

Robert Higgs Comments for LewRockwell.com: “How can a government that maintains more than 800 military facilities in more than 140 different foreign countries be anything other than an imperial power? The hundreds of thousands of troops who operate those bases and conduct operations from them, not to mention the approximately 125,000 sailors and Marines aboard the U.S. warships that cruise the oceans, are not going door to door selling Girl Scout cookies. United States of America is the name; intimidation is the game.

Of course, the kingpins who control this massive machinery of coercion never describe it in such terms. In their lexis, American motives and actions are invariably noble. Listening to these bigwigs describe what the U.S. forces abroad are doing, you would never suspect that they seek anything but ‘regional stability,’ ‘security,’ ‘deterrence of potential regional aggressors,’ and ‘economic development and cooperation among nations.’ Inasmuch as hardly anybody favors instability, insecurity, international aggression, economic retrogression, and mutual strife among nations, the U.S. objectives, and hence the actions taken in their furtherance, would appear to be indisputably laudable.

Yet, from time to time, a U.S. leader lets slip an expression so revealing that it warrants a thousand times greater weight than the vague, mealy-mouthed banalities they routinely dispense. I came across such a statement recently. In seeking funds in 2007 for construction of a $62 million ammunition storage facility at Bagram Air Base, Admiral William J. Fallon, then the commander of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), referred to Bagram as ‘the centerpiece for the CENTCOM Master Plan for future access to and operations in Central Asia.’

Pause to savor this phrase for a moment; let it roll around in your mind: CENTCOM Master Plan for future access to and operations in Central Asia. What an intriguing expression! What dramatic images of future U.S. military actions it evokes! But can those actions be anything other than the very sort that empires undertake? Ask yourself: why does the U.S. military anticipate conducting operations in Central Asia, a region that lies thousands of miles from the United States and comprises countries that lack either the capacity or the intention to seriously harm Americans who mind their own business in their own national territory? Indeed, what is the U.S. military doing in Central Asia in the first place? Have you ever heard of ‘the Great Game? Continue…

 

 

The Veiled Face of Washington’s “Diplomacy”: You need Uncle Sam, Iraq told
Gareth Porter writes for the Asia Times (Hong Kong): “Instead of moving toward accommodating the demand of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki for a timetable for United States military withdrawal, the George W Bush administration and the US military leadership are continuing to pressure their erstwhile client regime to bow to the US demand for a long-term military presence in the country.

The emergence of this defiant US posture toward the Iraqi withdrawal demand underlines just how important long-term access to military bases in Iraq has become to the US military and national security bureaucracy in general.

From the beginning, the Bush administration's response to the
Maliki withdrawal demand has been to treat it as a mere aspiration that the US need not accept.


The counter-message that has been conveyed to Iraq from a multiplicity of US sources, including former Central Command (CENTCOM) commander William Fallon, is that the security objectives of Iraq must include continued dependence on US troops for an indefinite period.
The larger, implicit message, however, is that the US is still in control, and that it - not the Iraqi government - will make the final decision.

That point was made initially by State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos, who stated flatly on July 9 that any US decision on withdrawal "will be conditions-based".

In a sign that the US military is also mounting pressure on the Iraqi government to abandon its withdrawal demand, Fallon wrote an op-ed piece published in the New York Times on July 20 that called on Iraqi leaders to accept the US demand for long-term access to military bases.

Fallon, who became something of a folk hero among foes of the Bush administration's policy in the Middle East for having been forced out of his CENTCOM position for his anti-aggression stance,
takes an extremely aggressive line against the Iraqi withdrawal demand in the op-ed. The piece is remarkable not only for its condescending attitude toward the Iraqi government, but for its peremptory tone toward it.

Fallon is dismissive of the idea that Iraq can take care of itself without US troops to maintain ultimate control. "The government of Iraq is eager to exert its sovereignty," Fallon writes, "but its leaders also recognize that it will be some time before Iraq can take full control of security."

Fallon insists that
"the government of Iraq must recognize its continued, if diminishing reliance on the American military". And in the penultimate paragraph he demands "political posturing in pursuit of short-term gains must cease".

Fallon, now retired from the military, is obviously serving as a stand-in for US military chiefs for whom the public expression of such a hardline stance against the Iraqi withdrawal demand would have been considered inappropriate.

But the former US military proconsul in the Middle East, like his active-duty colleagues, appears to actually believe that the US can intimidate the Maliki government.
The assumption implicit in his op-ed is that the US has both the right and power to preempt Iraq's national interests to continue to build its military empire in the Middle East.

As CENTCOM chief, Fallon had been planning on the assumption that the US military would continue to have access to military bases in both Iraq and Afghanistan for many years to come. A July 14 story by Washington Post national security and intelligence reporter Walter Pincus said that the army had requested US$184 million to build power plants at its five main bases in Iraq.

The five bases, Pincus reported, are among the "final bases and support locations where troops, aircraft and equipment will be consolidated as the US military presence is reduced".

Funding for the power plants, which would be necessary to support a large US force in Iraq within the five remaining bases, for a longer-term stay, was eliminated from the military construction bill for fiscal year 2008. Pincus quoted a congressional source as noting that the power plants would have taken up to two years to complete.

The plan to keep several major bases in Iraq is just part of a larger plan, on which Fallon himself was working, for permanent US land bases in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Fallon revealed in congressional testimony last year that
Bagram air base in Afghanistan is regarded as "the centerpiece for the CENTCOM master plan for future access to and operations in Central Asia".

As Fallon was writing his op-ed, the Bush administration was planning for a video conference between Bush and Maliki, evidently hoping to move the obstreperous Maliki away from his position on withdrawal.
Afterward, however, the White House found it necessary to cover up the fact that Maliki had refused to back down in the face of Bush's pressure.

It issued a statement claiming that the two leaders had agreed to "a general time horizon for meeting aspirational goals" but that the goals would include turning over more control to Iraqi security forces and the "further reduction of US combat forces from Iraq" - but not a complete withdrawal.

But that was quickly revealed to be a blatant misrepresentation of Maliki's position. As Maliki's spokesman Ali Dabbagh confirmed, the "time horizon" on which Bush and Maliki had agreed not only covered the "full handover of security responsibility to the Iraqi forces in order to decrease American forces" but was to "allow for its [sic] withdrawal from Iraq".

An adviser to Maliki, Sadiq Rikabi, also told the Washington Post that Maliki was insisting on specific timelines for each stage of the US withdrawal, including the complete withdrawal of troops.

The Iraqi prime minister's July 19 interview with the German magazine Der Speigel, in which he said that Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama's 16-month timetable "would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes", was the Iraqi government's bombshell in response to the Bush administration's efforts to pressure it on the bases issue.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack emphasized at his briefing on Tuesday that the issue would be determined by "a conclusion that's mutually acceptable to sovereign nations".

That strongly implied that the Bush administration regarded itself as having a veto power over any demand for withdrawal and signals an intention to try to intimidate Maliki.

Both the Bush administration and the US military appear to harbor the illusion that the US troop presence in Iraq still confers effective political control over its clients in Baghdad.

However, the change in the Maliki regime's behavior over the past six months, starting with the prime minister's abrupt refusal to go along with General David Petraeus' plan for a joint operation in the southern city of Basra in mid-March, strongly suggests that
the era of Iraqi dependence on the US has ended.

Given the strong consensus on the issue among Shi'ite political forces of all stripes, as well as Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the Shi'ite spiritual leader,
the Maliki administration could not back down to US pressure without igniting a political crisis.”

Gareth Porter is an investigative historian and journalist specializing in US national security policy. The paperback edition of his latest book, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam, was published in 2006. (Inter Press Service)

 

Get Out of Afghanistan Too
Charley Reese comments on the real story of that poor country.

 

 

Paul Craig Roberts: Facing The Facts About Israel

Paul Craig Roberts writes: “I had given up on finding an American with a moral conscience and the courage to go with it and was on the verge of retiring my keyboard when I met the Rev. Thomas L. Are.

 

Rev. Are is a Presbyterian pastor who used to tell his Atlanta, Georgia, congregation: "I am a Zionist." Like most Americans, Rev. Are had been seduced by Israeli propaganda and helped to spread the propaganda among his congregation. 

 

Around 1990 Rev. Are had an awakening for which he credits the Christian Canon of St. George's Cathedral in Jerusalem and author Marc Ellis, co-editor of the book, Beyond Occupation.

 

Realizing that his ignorance of the situation on the ground had made him complicit in great crimes, Rev. Are wrote a book hoping to save others from his mistake and perhaps in part to make amends, Israeli Peace Palestinian Justice, published in Canada in 1994. 

 

Rev. Are researched his subject and wrote a brave book. Keep in mind that 1994 was long prior to Walt and Mearsheimer's recent book, which exposed the power of the Israel Lobby and its ability to control the explanation Americans receive about the "Israeli-Palestinian conflict." 

 

Rev. Are begins with an account of Israel's opening attack on the Palestinians, an event which took place before most Americans alive today were born. He quotes the distinguished British historian, Arnold J. Toynbee: "The treatment of the Palestinian Arabs in 1947 (and 1948) was as morally indefensible as the slaughter of six million Jews by the Nazis. Though nor comparable in quantity to the crimes of the Nazis, it was comparable in quality." Continue…

 

More Than 100,000 Detainees Released Under Iraq Pardon Law

Aswat al-Iraq (Voices of Iraq) reports: ‘The number of detainees released under the general amnesty law, launched by the government in February, reached more than 100,000, the higher judicial council said on Tuesday.


’A total of 109087 prisoners from different Iraqi provinces were released since the pardon law became effective,’ the council said in a statement, received by Aswat al-Iraq – Voices of Iraq – (VOI).


The Iraqi presidential council had approved on February 22 the general pardon law no. 19 of 2008 in a bid to enhance reconciliation in Iraq.”

 

---

 

 

 

---

 

“Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder

respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”

 

~George Orwell~

 

NEW YORK TIMES profit drops 82%...

 

TOYOTA beats GM in worldwide sales...

 

Airport Shock: TSA Agents Force Woman To Remove Nipple Rings; Pull Down Pants Of Disabled Man...

 

Russian-European manned spaceship design unveiled...

 

US general warns Russia on nuclear bombers in Cuba...

 

Sarkozy wins constitution battle by single vote

 

Germans Urge Obama Not to Call for More Troops in Afghanistan

 

I'll pull out troops unless Israel halts West Bank raids, warns Abbas

 

Turkey said ready to invest $10 billion in Iran

 

Mubarak discuss expansion of cooperation with Russian leader Medvedev

 

Colonialists want to cut Sudan into pieces, says Ahmadinejad

 

French, Germans, Britons Favor Obama for President, Poll Shows

 

Singh celebrates vote win on US nuclear deal, says millions will benefit

 

Australian oil production has peaked, new report says

 

Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz demands immediate impeachment of Musharraf

 

US Can Download Your Laptop At Border Crossings

 

Privacy vs. Border Security: Critics Say Laptop Searches Cross the Line

Janet I. Tu, of The Seattle Times, reports: "Jawad Khaki, a corporate executive from Sammamish, was returning home from a business trip to Ireland and Germany last year when a customs agent at the airport asked him to turn on his cellphone. He already had told the agent in detail where he had traveled and why, so when the agent began looking over the to-do list and calendar in his phone, Khaki was shocked. 'It was an invasion of privacy,' he said. 'I thought it was going too far.' Khaki's story joins what seem to be growing numbers of similar reports from people - many of them Muslims or of Middle Eastern or South Asian descent - who say that their laptops, cellphones or other electronic devices were searched or seized at airports or U.S. border crossings, and that they've been questioned extensively." Continue…

 

Russia/Venezuela Deal To Stop “US Aggression”

 

Venezuela needs Russia for protection, says Chávez

 

Russia threatens criminal action against US tobacco companies  'nicotine genocide'

 

Iran to get new Russian S-300 air defence missile batteries

 

Ecuador looks to Iran and China in new oil refinery

 

Ecuador’s president now in US neocon crosshairs

 

Mexico's Oil Output Falls 9.7 Percent in First Half of Year

 

US dollar declines to a new multi-year low against Mexican peso

 

Tensions between Japan and South Korea over disputed group of islands show little sign of easing

 

 

 

PERSPECTIVE

 

HE'S BACK! Ross Perot Sponsors New Public Interest Website

 

 

 

 

An extraordinarily prescient video interview with General Norman Schwarzkopf and Robert Gates - Deputy National Security Advisor to Former President George Bush Sr.

 

Why Invading Iraq Was A Very Stupid Idea…

 

(Click on blinking dot above for video)